*Set Operations on Relations*

The three most common operations on sets are union, intersection, and difference. We assume the reader is familiar with these operations, which are described as follows on arbitrary sets R and S:

On December 09, 2013, In Relational Algebra by Admin

Views (1957)

The three most common operations on sets are union, intersection, and difference. We assume the reader is familiar with these operations, which are described as follows on arbitrary sets R and S:

On December 16, 2013, In Relational Algebra by Admin

Views (1768)

The selection operator, applied to a relation R, creates a new relation with a subset of R's tuples. The tuples in the resulting relation are those that satisfy some condition C that involves the attributes of R. We denote this operation σc(R). The schema for the resulting relation is the

On January 07, 2014, In Relational Algebra by Admin

Views (1520)

Some of the operations that we have explained in previous sections can be expressed in terms of other relational-algebra operations. For instance, intersection can be expressed in terms of set difference:

On January 15, 2014, In Relational Algebra by Admin

Views (1784)

While a set of tuples (i.e., a relation) is a simple, natural model of data as it might appear in a database, commercial database systems rarely, if ever, are based entirely on sets. In some situations, relations as they appear in database systems are allowed to have duplicate

On January 20, 2014, In Relational Algebra by Admin

Views (4651)

When we take the union of two bags, we add the number of occurrences of each tuple. That is, if R is a bag in which the tuple t appears n times, and S is a bag in which the tuple t appears m times, then in the bag R U S tuple t appears n + m times. Note that either n or m (or

Tags : tuples, attributes

On January 27, 2014, In Relational Algebra by Admin

Views (1476)

To apply a selection to a bag, we apply the selection condition to each tuple separately. As always with bags, we do not remove duplicate tuples in the result.

On February 11, 2014, In Relational Algebra by Admin

Views (2656)

An Algebra of Relational Operations presented the classical relational algebra, and Relational Operations on Bags introduced the modifications required to treat relations as bags of tuples rather than sets. The ideas of these two sections serve as a base for most of

On February 18, 2014, In Relational Algebra by Admin

Views (2599)

Sometimes we do not want simply the average or some other aggregation of an entire column. Rather, we need to examine the tuples of a relation in groups, equivalent to the value of one or more other columns, and we aggregate only within each group. As an example, assume

On February 25, 2014, In Relational Algebra by Admin

Views (1770)

Well now reexamine the projection operator πL(R) introduced in Set Operations on Relations under projection. In the classical relational algebra, L is a list of (some of the) attributes of R. We extend the projection operator to allow it to compute with components of tuples as well

On April 12, 2014, In Relational Algebra by Admin

Views (1844)

The same constraint notation permits us to express far more than referential integrity. For instance, we can express any functional dependency as an algebraic constraint, although the notation is more awkward than the FD notation introduced in Functional Dependencies.

- March 2013
- April 2013
- May 2013
- June 2013
- July 2013
- August 2013
- September 2013
- October 2013
- November 2013
- December 2013
- January 2014
- February 2014
- March 2014
- April 2014
- May 2014
- June 2014
- July 2014
- August 2014
- September 2014
- October 2014
- November 2014
- December 2014
- January 2015
- February 2015
- March 2015
- April 2015
- May 2015
- June 2015
- July 2015
- August 2015
- January 2016
- February 2016
- December 2016
- April 2017
- May 2017